Julie Matheson

Subiaco Councillor | Certified Financial Planner | DAP Expert

Wedge zoning R80

Post 20 2 13 wedge zoning R80

Background information:

On 28 September 2011 the City of Subiaco received correspondence from the WAPC requesting comments on the MRS Rezoning application.

  1. On 11 October 2011 the Council resolved to advise the WAPC of its support for the MRS Rezoning application.
  2. On 8 November 2011 the Development Services Committee (DSC) received a notice of a late item “Proposed Amendment No.17 to Town Planning Scheme No.4 – Rezoning of lots 2,3,4,7 & 412 Railway Road, Subiaco”.  A report from the Senior Strategic Planning Officer dated 20 October 2011 which recommended zoning as Commercial/Residential with a additional use number of A22 to allow for added uses of consulting rooms, restaurant and shop and a plot ratio maximum of 3.2 and additional maximum wall heights (the TPS rezoning report).  The Committee decided report lie on the table whilst Councillors consider the site further.
  3. On 22 November 2011 the Council met.  The TPS rezoning report was not placed on the agenda whilst Councillors continued to  considered the site further
  4. On 6 December 2011 the Acting Coordinator Statutory Planning presented a report to the DSC regarding the Development application as amended (the DA report).  The DA was presented to Council and it voted to lie on the Table for the following reasons:

i.            The Committee is not in a position to provide a recommendation on this application as the site is not yet appropriately zoned under the Metropolitan Region Scheme and Town Planning Scheme No. 4. The Committee resolved to advise the WAPC that it would be desirable to defer the determination of this application until the proposed amendments to the Metropolitan Region Scheme and Town Planning Scheme No. 4 have been finalised.

ii.            Later in the meeting the Committee decided to lift the item from the table so that its Resolution to REFUSE the development application could be submitted to the WA Planning Commission on the basis of:

1)The proposed bulk and scale of the development would unreasonably impact upon the adjoining residential amenity of the adjacent residential properties on Bagot Road, and the streetscape amenity of Railway Road.

2)  The intensity of the proposed land use could potentially result in adverse impacts to traffic movement on Railway Road and Bagot Road.

3)The lack of street activation to the Railway Road and Bagot Road frontages would not result in a positive contribution to the amenity of the locality, ref. p.203

  1. On 20 December 2011 the TPS rezoning report (previously before the DSC on 8 November 2012) was considered by Council.  The zoning recommendation was rejected and the Council resolved to initiate TPS zoning of Residential R80 (the Council’s TPS rezoning decision).   Cr Matheson gave the following reasons:

i.             the proposed rezoning by Bagot Developments encourages bulk and scale that would unreasonably impact upon the adjoining residential amenity of the adjacent residential properties on Bagot Road, and the streetscapes of Railway Road;

ii.            The intensity of the proposed rezoning by Bagot Developments could potentially result in adverse impacts to traffic movement on Railway and Bagot Road;

iii.             the proposed rezoning by Bagot Development could result in the potential loss of street activation to the Railway Road and Bagot Road frontages would not result in a positive contribution to the amenity of the locality;

iv.            to change the existing use from non-conforming to conforming use as residential with the appropriate rezoning referenced under TPS4;

v.            the site is an entry point to Subiaco’s existing character and amenity in living, shopping and entertainment so any redevelopment should reflect the development pattern, scale, character, details and materials of the predominant building types; and

vi.            the site’s proximity and setback of the King Edward Memorial Hospital, and surrounding heritage buildings.

  1. On 19 April 2012 the WAPC wrote to Subiaco council advising of the plans to advertise change from reserve to urban.   The WAPC advertised the MRS Rezoning application for public comment between 24 April and 29 June 2012
  2. During the advertising period submissions from Subiaco residents were sent to the WAPC to both support of the change from Public Use – Hospital, and Council’s resolution to rezone the site Residential R80.
  3. On 28 June 2012, Ms Kathy Bonus wrote to the DoP regarding the proposed amendment No. 17 to rezone the site Residential R80
  4. Prior to the cut off date of 29 June 2012 for submissions for change to Urban, the WAPC received submissions stating support for the zoning Residential R80.
  5. On 20 July 2012, the DoP Planning Director Mat Selby sent a letter to Ms Bonus explaining that the DAP had legally approved a commercial building (undated) and it would be non-conforming use if the site was zoned Residential R80.  The content of this letter is intended to persuade the planning staff that Council’s Resolution is not considered to be reflective orderly and proper planning.
  6. On 4 September 2012, Councillors were advised of the letter from Mat Selby and the Staff’s Recommendation to rescind the resolution by Council on 20 December 2011 and rezone the site Commercial/Residential in order to meet the requests made in this letter.
  7. On 11 September 2012, Council members at the Development Services Committee resolved to reaffirm its 20 December 2011 decision
  8. On 25 September 2012, Council members at the Council meeting again resolved to reaffirm its 20 December 2011 decision.
  9. On 25 January 2013, Neil Thomson of the WAPC wrote to residents confirming the change to Urban with a report that includes all the submissions made.  None were against the zoning resolved by Council on 20 December 2011.
  10. On 12 February 2013, Council members at the Development Services Committee resolved confirm the change of reserve to Urban and to reaffirm its 20 December 2011 decision to zone the site Residential R80.

 

Advertisements

One comment on “Wedge zoning R80

  1. Pingback: Uglification of Perth suburbs – Julie Matheson's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 21, 2013 by in DAP, Planning, Residential.
%d bloggers like this: